Wednesday, August 31, 2005

Launching the CHOGM 2005 Series



Less than a hundred days before the Commonwealth Heads of Government kicks off in November 2004, I shall be posting you with a series of articles on the Commonwealth countries participating, the prospects of the meeting and a series of tips about Malta to foreigners on stay during the Meeting. The series shall also contain links to press articles about the CHOGM worldwide.

This initiative is being launched in order to create awareness on the political significance of the CHOGM amongst the readers of Malta Daily Blog.

Monti to the Full

Ex-EU Commissioner Mario Monti launched a proposal last week to recreate a solid centre government, free of any bi-partisan conflict, with the aim of re-vitalising the ailing Italian economy. This idea was launched on Italian daily La Stampa following Monti’s observation of the current state of the Italian economy and deliberations on the inability of either side of the bi-partisan settlement to tackle the serious problems Italy is faced with.

Monti’s comments may very well be applied to Malta. With our GDP currently standing at 0.1% and exports down 14% in the first quarter of 2005, the Maltese bi-partisan political spectrum is still proving itself incapable to come up with any concrete proposal that will help Malta solve its problems. This is why the need for a moderate party operating in a ‘Grande Centro’ (Grand Centre) in Malta is greatly felt.

Instead of delivering results to the Maltese electorate, the present system is proving capable at delivering only useless bickering that is wasting Malta precious resources. These could instead be spent on making Malta a success story in the Mediterranean region. The current state of affairs is chaining Malta to a ‘status quo’ situation where new ideas are simply ruled out. This state of affairs cannot continue as it is embarrassing our nation on the international scene with foreign diplomats believing that Malta is only good at complaining and criticising and not proposing.

This is why there needs to be a new centre party, free of any useless conflict, committed only towards Malta. There needs to be a new centre party capable of proposing and achieving national unity and progress for all. There needs to be a new pro-active party full with positive answers to Malta’s problem.

There should be a new centre party because the people feel disgruntled and lost in their own society, as relatively low participation rates in local elections show. This is why this new centre party shall be an effort coming from the people, directed towards the people, implemented together with the people.

This is why I agree with Monti to the full as the bi-partisan system in Malta has proven to be of great damage to society unless some major structural changes are carried into both major political parties.

Malta’s Aims on Irregular Immigration

In an article shown on The Times of Malta on Thursday 25th August, Minister for Home Affairs Tonio Borg outlines a three-pronged diplomatic approach Malta is following in order to find a solution for its own irregular immigration problem. The three main aims described by Minister Borg are to:

“¤ Request resettlement in European Union countries;
¤ Participate in EU joint repatriation flights;
¤ Strive for ad hoc repatriation arrangements with neighbouring Libya from where most of the immigrants start their Europe-bound journey”

A reflection on the Borg’s three aims may lead us to the conclusion that all three aims, if successfully pursued by the Government, will have their own repercussions on Europe thus on Malta. This is because Malta is not proposing any concrete measure that would alleviate the economic and social problems irregular immigration poses on European Society. By sending immigrants elsewhere in Europe would mean keeping the same problem but at the same time creating economic pressures on other countries thus possibly reducing the economic potential of Europe. The proposals Malta is putting forward can thus be seen as not being holistic and having an effect only in the short-term.

The first aim - “[to] Request resettlement in European Union countries” - will only dilute Malta’s problem. If this plead were to be accepted then Malta’s problem will only be partially solved, as the numbers of irregular immigrants will reduce but the number of arrivals won’t. It is also possible that the number of arrivals would increase as the disparities between the Northern and Southern Hemispheres of the World would continue to increase. Moreover this request is highlights the ignorance of the Maltese government on the current state of irregular immigration in the European Union. Malta is not, as some want to make the citizens believe, the only country facing this problem. The European Commission estimated in 2003 that there were more than 3 million irregular immigrants in the fifteen-state European Union.

This request can very well be replaced with an application for funds under the AGRO [link to AGRO web site] project and a proposal for the setting up of a common border patrol agency between Mediterranean countries. Common border patrol initiatives, previously launched by Spain and Italy on two different occasions, are an effective measure on how traffickers can be caught thus reducing the number of risky voyages across the Mediterranean.

The Government should also strive to push the Tampere conclusions on immigrants and asylum seekers high up on the European Agenda. Tampere is the name of a European Council meeting where important decisions on the issues of justice, security and freedom were taken. One of the proposals was to set up a common immigration and asylum policy within the European Union. This may couple the efforts of a common border patrol agency for Europe’s borders.

I find myself in total disagreement with the third proposal where the government is proposing to, “Strive for ad hoc repatriation arrangements with neighbouring Libya from where most of the immigrants start their Europe-bound journey”. Libya is not a signatory of the 1951 Geneva Convention, an instrument which guarantees humane treatment to asylum seekers and prisoners of war. Therefore, by sending the immigrants back to Libya, would effectively mean Malta agreeing to any treatment inflicted on the immigrants as soon as they arrive into Libya.

The third aim would rather be replaced by a clear commitment from the Maltese Government to ensure a better global governance system where the existing economic and social disparities between the North and South would be reduced. Malta should lobby in the European Council of Ministers in favour of a stronger international voice of Europe in world affairs and bilateral co-operation between the European Union and the United Nations.

Only a holistic approach to the problem of irregular immigration and consideration to our European partners’ problems concerning illegal immigration will permit Malta to come up with real proposals that will have an impact in the long-run. Only through substance will Malta obtain support from its international partners.

Impressions of Paris Fire

The International Herald Tribune is displaying on its web site a slide-show on the Paris Fires that hit a block of apartments inhabited by immigrants on August 30th.

From IHT.com:

For the second time in four days, flames tore through a dilapidated building housing African immigrants in Paris, this time killing seven people and sharpening a debate about the living conditions of tens of thousands of the city's poorest residents.
The latest blaze, on Monday night, brings the combined death toll of three such fires since April to 48, including 28 children.
The images of Africans fleeing the flames of their homes have become a powerful illustration of three related challenges facing many Western countries: Immigration is rising, economic inequality is widening and housing prices continue climbing.
About 40 West Africans, most of them from Ivory Coast and many of them illegal immigrants, had been squatters since 1999 in the five-story building that burned. It stood in the Marais district near some of the city's most sought-after addresses.
There were no fire extinguishers nor any running water to wet towels against the smoke.
The fire probably broke out on the second-floor landing of the wooden stairwell around 10 p.m. and took three hours to contain, emergency officials said Tuesday. The flames raced up the stairwell, trapping several inhabitants in the upper stories.
Two men saved their lives by jumping out of windows, suffering serious injuries. One mother, who was later found dead with her three-year-old child, pushed her six-year-old son out of a fourth-floor window. The child died two hours later in a hospital.
The scorched bodies of a family of four, living on the top floor, were found in the debris after the interior of the building collapsed. The mother had been pregnant with twins.
On Tuesday morning, a smell of charred wood lingered in the air outside the building's blackened facade.
Amid wailing women mourning the deaths of friends and family, Bafeteke Dosso, 32, stood shaking his head in disbelief at his neighbors' sudden deaths - and his own survival. Dosso said he lived next to the family that died and survived only because he worked a night shift.
"My neighbor called me at 10:15 p.m. last night when I was at work," he said. "He told me there was a fire and that people were jumping out of the window like on Sept. 11," referring to victims of terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center in New York.
City officials said a short-circuit resulting from makeshift electrical wiring might have been the cause, although they added it was too early to rule out arson or other causes. Arson or an accident is suspected in another deadly fire last Friday, after officials ruled out structural causes, such as bad elecrical wiring.
According to Yves Contassot, deputy mayor of Paris for the environment, the tale of the burned building speaks for many others. Now owned by the city, the house previously belonged to an unidentified person living outside Paris, Contassot said. It stood empty starting in 1990 and became increasingly rundown.
After the squatters arrived in 1999, city officials, conscious of the safety risks, demanded that the owner repair those parts of the buildings deemed unstable and secure the hazardous electrical wiring. They also asked the water company to restore running water, but to no avail. Instead, the inhabitants fetched water in buckets from a nearby fountain on the street.
When the city threatened to requisition the building in 2001, the owner demanded what Contassot called an exorbitant price. A three-year legal battle ensued, finally resulting in a transaction last year.
"This is not just about immigrants, it's about a worrying trend of speculation in the real estate market and about growing inequality in society," Contassot said.
"Paris has never had more vacant buildings, but the poor don't have access to them."
He said that almost 140,000 housing units are vacant in the city today and that about 72,000 units are second homes of people with their main residence elsewhere in France or abroad.
According to a report by the Abbé Pierre Foundation of Housing for the Underprivileged published this year, the prices of older houses and apartments have doubled over the past five years while those for newer housing rose by 78 percent.
Meanwhile, said Patrick Doutreligne, director of the foundation, the French are only 24 percent richer, so housing is becoming proportionally more and more expensive.
In the greater Paris region, some 300,000 people are waiting to be allocated government-subsidized housing. In central Paris alone, more than 100,000 applications currently compete for 12,000 subsidized apartments.
While their requests are pending, families often end up living in overcrowded and unsafe conditions. In 2002, City Hall declared 1,036 buildings in Paris unsafe and is in the process of renovating them.
Last Friday, a fire killed 17 in a building housing 130, mainly Malian, immigrants with demands for social housing pending for as many as 14 years. On April 15, a blaze in a budget hotel, where the government had put up immigrants waiting for their papers, killed 24.
On Tuesday politicians scrambled to express their concern about France's housing situation and offer solutions.
"There is a very serious problem with unsafe buildings in Paris," Mayor Bertrand Delanoë said on Tuesday. "We want to attack this problem."
President Jacques Chirac expressed his "horror" at the tragedy and said the government would announce a range of measures on Thursday.
Interior Minister Nicholas Sarkozy ordered all illegally occupied buildings in Paris closed, without indicating where the squatters would be housed.
But if rising immigration and soaring prices have intensified the issue in recent years, the twin problem of scarce social housing and unsafe provisional lodging is not new.
In 1986, three fires in budget hotels housing immigrants killed 18.
"How many more people have to die until the authorities act?" asked Amina Sidibe of the High Council of Malians in France on Tuesday.
"This problem has been around for decades."

Gavin Contro il Mondo

In an article shown today on l-Orizzont (a left leaning local newspaper published in Maltese), Labour MP Gavin Gulia deplores government for not having solved the irregular immigration problem during the ten days he was away from Malta. He proposes Malta to take "drastic action" in light of the lack of attention Malta has received from the International Community.

Gulia seems to believe that by making an allusion to vulgar expressions like, "I'll tell you now in which anatomical part will the EU consider our 'voice' (Nixtieq nghidilkom f’liema parti ta’ l-anatomija tal-bniedem l-Unjoni Ewropea se tpoggi l-”vuci” taghna)" he will persuade the readers that Labour, the party he represents is committed to provide constructive criticm. Poor man, his miss is as hood as a mile.

By throwing mud on the Maltese complaints, Gulia, and the Left in Malta is not going anywhere. Instead of pushing the common border patrol agency project launched in 2000, or imitating Spain, France, Portugal, Italy and the United Kingdom who in 2002 launched a border patrol operation dubbed Ulysses or else suggesting a proposal for the ARGO programme, Left media and Labour politicians prefer to play the government's game - misinform the public and play the victim.

I hope Gulia and friends take McNulthy's advice, cut this nonsense and start working on something substantial instead. We need action, not words.

Tuesday, August 30, 2005

McNulthy to Malta: Roll up your sleeves

Speaking during a meeting with Home Affairs Minister Tonio Borg, British counterpart for immigration Tony Mc Nulthy adopted a no-nonsense approach to the problem the Mediterranean currently faces. Herman Grech for The Times of Malta reports.

"The UK Minister for Immigration has urged the Maltese to make a concerted effort to find a solution to the problem of illegal immigration instead of just being critical.
...

Speaking during a news conference, Mr McNulthy took a no-nonsense approach: 'Those who are good at criticising would do better to come on board and seek a solution. It's easier to criticise, but it's less easy to roll up your sleeves, get down to work and try to find a solution... even if I don't blame people for their frustrations.'

...

He admitted that the resettlement request would be difficult to execute, saying it was not a key solution to the immigration problem - even if countries like the Netherlands were willing to discuss the matter. In essence, the problem of illegal immigration should be discussed at EU level, Mr McNulthy said.

[In other news,] Italian Foreign Minister Gianfranco Fini and his Maltese counterpart Michael Frendo have agreed to put forward a joint request for help in connection with irregular migration during the EU's External Relations Council in Newport later this week.
Malta and Germany are planning to apply for EU funds to operate joint repatriation flights for failed asylum seekers and Malta has also been lobbying Libya to take its share of responsibility in preventing migrants from flooding the island from its shores."

Sunday, August 28, 2005

Brit Humour!

In the latest issue of the Sunday Times of London Sarah-Kate Templeton and Jonathan Calvert write on hilarious measures the British Government will adopt in an eventual outbreak of a pandemic derived from the Avian Flu.

The journalists write:

"Although senior government ministers would be among the high-priority cases, the department said this weekend that it had not decided whether to include opposition politicians. "

At least Malta seems to be better prepared with 25% of the population being secured.

Malta 1 - Britain 0

Saturday, August 27, 2005

Freedom Fighter

Last time, a friend of mine narrates, when travelling on a bus, a Maltese teenager was heard speaking to a couple of foreign tourists. She was praising their lifestyle and saying how she envies them because they’re so liberal…they can have sex before marriage without being condemned. In Malta this can’t happen.

Since when has the notion of freedom been reduced to such a level? Is freedom truly the possibility to do whatever one likes and desires? Does freedom really mean the presence of no constraints?

I pity the girl for believing that freedom is translated into such an easy equation. In fact I believe that the freedom she describes is the greatest limitation ever put on the human being. I find the belief that one can do whatever he likes simply as irrational.

Constraints are the true fabric of human being. Scientists in the field of language study that meaning (semantics) can at times be incomplete as the human being has not yet managed to categorise the linguistic universe around him completely. Thus freedom to do whatever one likes is impossible in human nature.

There are primarily three reasons for such an assertion. The first reason is related to man’s finitude. Man is no immortal being. He is born dying. Therefore time is his greatest limit. In fact certain philosophers believe that time is being. Therefore, despite we possess a mind which can transcend from the present and travel into the future and past and to different locations at the same time, we remain trapped in a dying body. How can ever a dying creature believe it’s free to live?

The nature of dreams provides the second reason for my assertion. There are dreams that are highly unlikely to become a reality. We still fancy the idea of becoming rock stars or top football players even if we know that the likelihood of these becoming a reality is next to zero.

Secondly, the girl’s dream of having a liberal society where everything is free for all is a dream on which the whole market economy is based upon. Economics are a major constraint to our dreams as money is always short of supply therefore limiting our freedom of movement in the free economy. In modern societies we buy our freedom. We are born workers who want to buy and consume freedom in their own free time.

Therefore, if the human being, essentially, psychologically and economically is not free in the sense that he can do whatever he likes, what scope does freedom serve?

I think that the notion of freedom is an artificial idea that is meant to regulate the social aspect of the human being. Law in society is a perfect example as it determines what one is free to do and what one isn’t. Convention - and no dogma - determines freedom as laws are agreed upon by an authority which generally enjoys the support and allegiance of the majority of society. (The fact that the human being controls the level of freedom may even show how much freedom is not free, at least from interference from the human being.) This effectively means that freedom – in that there are freedoms, guaranteed by the law (thus convention) which one enjoys – is an essential aspectsa in society.

The question flows naturally: If freedom is reduced to convention, and if convention may be different in different societies thus making freedom relative, then would this make all societies free?

Therefore would this mean that being free to have sex before marriage makes Maltese society as free as any other which tolerates sex before marriage?

Big Brother

Once, a bus driver decided to start chatting on the European Union at three o’clock in the morning as he was driving me back home after a day’s work. At first, I felt really angry as I wanted to sleep – I was meant to wake up at seven in the morning next day – but, then, I was so absorbed into what he was telling me that it took me an hour to manage to get some sleep.

The driver’s arguments, though fallacious, did reveal a great feeling of insecurity towards the European Union. He claimed that “l-Ewropa”, as the European Project is known to Maltese, will soon be deciding to install chips inside every one of us in order to record our movements. I thought I was speaking to Orwell. I could see a wonderful metaphor in the driver’s assertion revealing his apprehension on the European Union intruding in his daily business. His assertion left me hanging and it triggered off my thoughts on the European Union and federalism.

In Malta there is a great concern amongst the citizens that the European Union may turn into a Federal State and gobble up its national identity, confirmed only until recently when Malta obtained Independence in 1964. The European Union is seen evermore as an intruder in their lives rather than as a project of peace, democracy and development. This feeling was confirmed by a survey carried out recently where 60% of the local population does not think positively of the European Union. What may be the reasons for such a feeling?

Malta, a peripheral suburb in the European Union, both geographically and also in its participation in the philosophical and political debate on the future of Europe, is not on honeymoon anymore with the European Union. It is instead disillusioned that the opportunities politicians spoke of in the run-up to the referendum and elections in 2003 are not materialising.

Possibly people feel they are not involved in the decision making process of the European Union. People may feel they are not consulted thus decisions taken in their name are seen more as an intrusion rather than as an effort to improve their livelihood. People feel lost. This is why democracy is badly needed.

The European Union needs to be more transparent in order to make citizens feel involved and reduce the fear-factor surrounding the European Project. The European Union needs to promote a greater democratic approach. I think time is ripe to initiate a real debate on the need of a European Constitution (after the first one was rejected) amongst citizens and not only on a European Council level. A bottom-up approach should be inspired thus truly practising the principal of subsidiarity.

I am avidly in favour of the European Project and I think that the European Union should be a democratic federal state where the people are involved in shaping the reality of their continent. This is why I think there is great need for democracy, great need for dialogue.

European Citizens who believe in Europe should start working in this direction. Citizens shall use all possibilities available to explore the European Project and to develop new ideas on the European Project. Anyone from anywhere shall start thinking and acting in order to continue building peace, development and prosperity.

Only by information, education and involvement shall the idea of a European Big Brother be dismantled and be replaced instead by a pro-active society ready to participate – and live – the European Project.

Fear of the ‘Dark’

As more and more migrants reach Malta’s shores, people in the streets keep on speaking on how the smallest European state may solve what Home Affairs Minister Tonio Borg termed as a “crisis”.

Away from the Prime Minister’s Office; deep into the Maltese streets set ablaze by the summer heat; people seem to have a different opinion on Malta’s obligations towards irregular immigrants. The latter cross the Sahara Desert to reach the Libyan shores where there they board a boat driven by their hope towards a better future, possibly in mainland Europe. The former think – or rather, feel – resentment and fear at what they prefer to term as an “invasion”.

A feeling of fear in fact prevails amongst the Maltese population on the presence of more than a thousand asylum seekers, currently detained in Army Barracks in the major island of the Maltese archipelago. People’s views are shifting at great speed towards the racist and xenophobic attitude of the far right, as a survey published by The Times recently showed.

A thousand may seem to be small a number but when compared to a population of less than a 400,000 inhabitants and the arrival of approximately 4,000 immigrants in three years, the right proportions are assumed. But some citizens still argue that Malta receives more than a million tourists a year and, still, no one ever speaks of a tourist invasion or of a threat on the social fabric of Maltese society. Therefore from where is this ‘fear of the dark’ coming?

A look at the Maltese history and romantic mythology may provide us with answers. Malta experienced two sieges: An Ottoman siege in 1565 and an active participation as an important Allied Mediterranean naval base in the Second World War. The 1565 siege, dubbed by historians as the Great Siege, was mystified by Maltese romantic poets in the early 20th century. These poets praised Malta as a bulwark of Christianity against Islam. The enemy is depicted as evil while the Maltese warrior is seen as heroic. This idea – which managed to help Malta gain self-confidence - is deep-rooted into Maltese thought.

It is these thoughts that the Maltese far-right politician re-visits. Ironically enough, it is by means of the very same romantic poets that Prime Minister Lawrence Gonzi makes his appeal for generosity and hospitality towards irregular immigrants. In fact, the romantic poet also praises Malta for its qualities of generosity and hospitality.
Therefore there may be a historical explanation to the problem Malta is currently facing whereas the myths perpetrated by the romantic poet have now become solid beliefs in some sectors of society.

Another cause to this ‘fear of the dark’ may be a great fear of the unknown. Having restricted access to all media, the Government has effectively permitted all detention centres to be enveloped in an aura of mystery – thus permitting popular legends on what happens inside to spread quickly. The hundred or so soldiers taking care of the asylum seekers are playing their part in spreading stories to their comrades whom they tell to their families. This is fast becoming an efficient network of misinformation where the immigrant is at times demonised.

Therefore I think that while the government is to continue implementing the measures it has announced, it should strive to embark on a serious information campaign where the plight of these individuals is shown and described. Furthermore the Government should make sure that press is granted access at all times to the detention centres in Malta. After all, this was a proposal in the National Conference on Irregular Immigration held in January 2005 – and like any other proposals mentioned, no or little action was taken.

In the meantime people remain scared of the dark.

Thursday, August 25, 2005

Clarke criticises euro failings

In an interview with Central Banking journal, Kennet Clarke attacks the Euro for not having brought "increased productivity, efficiency and living standards and stimulate policy reforms"

Tuesday, August 23, 2005

CHOGM?

Once, a journalist decided to interview passers-by in Republic Street. His question was: “What do you think CHOGM is?” After many “I don’t know” and “I don’t have the time” as an answer, a woman finally stopped to answer his question. An expression of terribilita’ – better than that on Michelangelo’s David – surrounded her face. She was thinking hard. The journalist anxiously waited for her to answer. After a couple of moments the woman said in a serious tone, “Mhux tal-bott il-blu?” (“Isn’t it a tin painted in blue?”)

This story didn’t happen in reality – only up till now. The fact is that the Maltese Government, host of the next Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting (yes, CHOGM!) is so late in marketing the event that it is running a big risk of receiving such answers from the ‘very well’ informed public opinion.

Recent articles in local newspapers are showing that certain sectors of the Maltese population are missing a great deal on the true meaning of Commonwealth and CHOGM and, instead, are more interested in highlighting the amount of exposure Malta will get during the event. No talk is being done on the real need to network for development - which happens to be the event’s theme. No debate is taking place on how the fifty-three participating countries may improve their relations with the aim of improving the livelihood of many citizens around the world.

Instead of debating the Commonwealth and trying to see which direction the meeting shall take, pundits are more interested in knowing what shall be the exact advantages Malta will attain. Some have already predicted a transport fiasco for the islanders. Others think this will be a great opportunity for tourism (they forget a significant chunk of these countries hail from a forgotten district called Third World). On the other hand I think that the real advantage for Malta is a chance to change. Malta, as a host country, will have a golden opportunity to inspire greater and better development which would reach all Commonwealth citizens.

The Commonwealth is a no-statute organisation. This means there is no constitution or any other binding document which nations have to adhere to. There are instead two declarations, namely, the Singapore and the Harare Declaration to which principles all Commonwealth countries are committed. CHOGM in Malta may be an opportunity to re-instate these principles, thus renewing the Commonwealth. But, on the other hand, there is an equal chance that CHOGM in Malta would be another lost opportunity for better, more humane, development. This would be the result of indifference from both the public and the government in things that really matter.

There will be another three meetings taking place in Malta before the CHOGM. These are the Commonwealth People’s Forum, the Commonwealth Youth Forum and the Commonwealth Business Forum. All three events are aimed at different sectors society. All three events have one goal – networking for development. It is in these events that true action may be advocated. It is in these events that NGOs, youth and business organisations may commit themselves to continue trying to build a better world. Society has an opportunity to inspire change through these meetings.

But for society to be able to inspire change it must first know of such an opportunity. This is why information is golden. This is why the government is to inform and educate the public on what the Commonwealth is and what the CHOGM intends to be. Through information, our government may truly inspire ideas for greater development – the real advantage of CHOGM.

Providing Answers to Terrorism: A New World Order

A little more than a month ago, Britain and Europe were shocked as they learnt that the London bombers where home-grown terrorists. No more did terrorists come from poor regions but, now, they also came from British cities. Unfortunately, it seems that terrorists, unlike politicians, are working in a global reality regardless of any territory or national border.

It seems that where politicians are failing, fundamentalists are succeeding. In fact, while certain sectors of politics remain indifferent towards the plight of certain societies, fundamentalists believe they can advocate the needs of those whom they believe are in need. Fundamentalism may be termed as the gap between globalisation and politics. Globalisation is evolving at a much faster rate than politics and this is causing a sort of vacuum. Some politicians still believe that what happens in one society will not affect their own society. Reality is proving to be different.

The fact is that, with globalisation, transport and communication have become much easier. For example, if it weren’t for internet you wouldn’t be reading this piece at the moment. Globalisation has dramatically increased the possibility of exposing realities, of reaching a greater audience. In fact the target is the world. It is not a nation or a locality anymore. This effectively means that national borders are being defied as freedom of movement of goods, people, capital – and ideas – is fast becoming a reality.

Therefore globalisation has created a new reality which is being exploited by fundamentalists. In fact if it weren’t for a greater access to transport, the British terrorists would not have flown to Pakistan where there they met the fundamentalists that hooked them into their evil project. Fundamentalists also use symbols of globalisation such as satellite television and the internet in order to display their deeds and carry out propaganda amongst their target audience.

This proneness from part of terror organisations to exploit the opportunities of globalisation may also be aided from the fact that they occupy no territory and have no responsibility for any jurisdiction, unlike what politicians have.

In fact, politicians seem to be currently facing a dilemma. They are bound to tackle the problems arising in their territory but they are also, in some way or another, responsible for the problems in other territories. As the experience of the European Project is showing (I am speaking of the Euro Currency), a problem in one country may hinder the development of another country. Therefore only by aiding a country solving its problem will more opportunities be created in the other country. It’s all a sort of multiplier effect.

This is why the aspect of networking is fast becoming crucial in today’s world. Governments are to network with each other in order to solve the problems afflicting them. One cannot dismiss any problem in any country because this may very well be the cause of a multitude of problems in another country. Armed conflicts and poverty in African countries is leading to a serious immigration problem in Europe especially in Southern European states.

Therefore a new world order is needed in order to replace the disorder fundamentalism is creating. But, unlike what the Neo-Con Hawks in the United States propose, that is, the country with the greatest economic influence shall be on top of a hierarchical system, I very much think that there should be a system where governments would be treated on an equal basis. All governments should equally be able to seek opportunities for networking and the principle of equity shall guide everyone to work in the direction of and share the results of development and prosperity.

This new world order may very well be expressed through a reformed United Nations. And the motive is simple. If any world order were to be based on economic output then there would be (presently or in the near future) three factions claiming the throne: United States, the European Union (given it decides to have a stronger voice in world politics) and China. This would give rise to conflicts. This may also mean that at the helm of the world order there may be countries that do not respect the freedom of the individual.

A reformed UN with greater powers would mean that the new world order would be based on commitment towards respect for human rights. A reformed UN would mean greater peace. A reformed UN would mean bridging the gap between the effects of globalisation and conventional politics as the role of the UN would be to promote the needs of the whole globe and promote networking initiatives aimed at achieving better development for all. Only so doing would the need for fundamentalism be ruled out and replaced by a clear answer against violence, in favour of peace and true development for all humankind.

Saturday, August 13, 2005

Globalia

Live8 and similar activities contribute to society in a million ways. But one will definitely stand out. They highlight the plight of the underserved. They show that the version of globalisation we are currently living is not leading us all to the promised destination: prosperity.

So is there something wrong with the concept of globalisation? Or is the concept of globalisation being wrongly implemented? In other words, is there something missing?

One may argue that globalisation as we know it today sees its genesis in the roaring twenties when greater investment in advertising helped increase consumer spending. Following the Second World War – even thanks to the decolonisation process - more communities opted to globalise their economic operations and see the whole world as their prospective customer. Today, thanks to other technological improvements like the internet, our world has effectively become what we all call “a global village”.

But if we were to ride Aladdin’s magic carpet would we see one idyllic village, just like the ones you see on post cards? Bono and Friends would plainly say no. And I agree. Though companies have managed to rule the world, prosperity doesn’t. There is poverty instead. The global village from up high is a big city of a few, very few, richly dressed people and many people “living in holes”, as British poet W.H. Auden would say.

Therefore, given the evident failure of the present system, should globalisation be scrapped and a new system dreamt of? Or should we, like real mechanics, thoroughly inspect our machine and then carry out the necessary repairs for an improved performance?

I would rather opt for the second option. I do not like any Che Guevaras running around. Unlike their professed hero they dream of everything and manage nothing. I like to inspect, criticise, and appreciate – something which I shall definitely do in globalisation’s case.

In fact, I think that globalisation is a concept which is not being interpreted to the full.

Let’s say that there is a global village. Now, if there were to be a global village, there must be global citizens. If there were to be global citizens, these must have a way of managing their own affairs. They must have their own politics, their own politicians. But, do you see any of them? I certainly don’t. I only see national and international politics, but no global politics.

The world of business and finance has managed to globalise its operations and not to distinguish between nationality and creed – because a FIAT may be driven by a Palestinian and an Israeli alike. On the other hand, the world of politics is not adjusting to this reality. The global citizen is simply not being catered for in a democratic way. Instead there seems to be an oligarchic system at the helm of Globalia - our global village - made of company bosses and influential shareholders. These in turn control the livelihoods of thousands of people. The equation is simple – the more a company sells, the greater its influence on the economy, the more a company employs, the greater its influence on the quality of life of the global village. Therefore the world is effectively controlled in two ways. One is proper and suits the financier’s role but the other one isn’t.

I firmly believe that the economy should be left flowing freely but I equally believe that people should decide on their own quality of life and not any oligarch instead. People must have the ability to influence decisions. This is why there should be a global (not only international) sense in doing politics - based on the principle of interdependence (that is, any decision taken in one community will affect another community because of the presence of a tightly knit global economic community) and because the basic needs of every human being living anywhere in the world are basically the same.

This is why I primarily advocate a reform of the United Nations where it would be more of United Peoples. The United Nations shall become a true forum where nations can raise issues concerning their community and seek help basing upon the principle of solidarity - a principle which has helped Europe achieve a long-lasting peace. The United Nations shall truly be a place where democracy is preached and practised possibly through a parliamentary system on multiple levels from local to regional to global parliamentary chambers all working with the same goal – achieving prosperity, for all. This would secure all peoples having an equal voice which would not be dependant on economic output but on human rights. The United Nations and its bodies shall strive even further to respect the Declaration of Human Rights and the Millennium Development Goals and attaining a dignified life for all.

Because dignified life is not a commodity but the cornerstone of humanity.

Friday, August 12, 2005

Congratulations!

The Times of Malta is this week celebrating its 70th birthday. A big congratulations from my part to all those who helped publish this paper throughout the years!